Wide-band UEGO AFR reverse SuperTrapp tuning and FAQ confirmation
As the SuperTrapp FAQ recommends, you should alter the number of exhaust diffusers, ride and determine if performance is more or less to your liking. Well, I now have a tool to take the guesswork out of the equation, confirm riding impressions, but arrive at the same desired result. This time, there's no arbitrary seat-of-the-pants impressions that could go either way. :confused: A wide-band Lambda sensor will give me 100% absolute real-time air to fuel ratio numbers to tell me how well I've tuned my Supertrapp and thus, my carburetors.
The AEM wide-band Lambda AFR digital readout and O2 sensor (30-4110*) was installed last year on my 900 Ninja (ZX-9R). I recorded many of the results over a variety of riding conditions. Last years readings however were on a different motor, running different engine coolant. Since it was cheaper to swap to a younger motor than to even replace the oil seals in my 128,000 mile motor, I now have a much lower mileage motor, but also running waterless engine coolant.
The combination of light oil leakage fouled my original AEM O2 sensor and eventually burned out the digital Lambda readout. One warranty replacement later, it's all working again and I have new numbers, different from before even though my carburetor jetting is mostly unchanged from before. I've confirmed my mid-range jetting is too lean, 15.2:1 lean at 55 MPH. Conventional SuperTrapp FAQ wisdom says to remove one or two diffuser plates to boost performance, get the AFR back below 14.7:1. Only this time, when I do, the AFR readout will tell me how much closer I am to ideal. My plan is to tune either only my SuperTrapp and/or my mid-range jet needle height to arrive at more ideal AFR numbers that I was seeing from the bike last year.
For those wondering or a bit puzzled about how an AFR readout got on a carburetted motorcycle, it's aftermarket.
https://uniim1.shutterfly.com/ng/ser...nhance/O2a.jpg
https://uniim1.shutterfly.com/ng/ser...a-ZX-9RsE1.jpg
* 30-4110 is the full kit. The cheaper 30-4110NS version stands for No Sensor, as in no O2 sensor.
What is one diffuser worth, removed?
When it contributes 5% to the gap of combined diffusers with a closed end-cap, it's enough to drop AFR on my 899cc sportbike as follows:
I don't know how to calculate surface area, so I'm just going with a numeric factor of the combined diffuser gap. AFR is about 0.2 lower up to 3K RPM, 0.3 lower at 3.8K/55 MPH and 0.5 lower at 4.7K/72 MPH.
Once it's safe for an interstate tank run, I'll know more about how this translates. I have some numbers recorded from last month for a baseline to compare to. And I was already satisfied with mid-range oomph, but it feels like there's a little bit more. If that's just in my head, it did seem like I made a mental bookmark of how the bike pulled, lighted the front wheel. I don't remember it doing that prior to tonight.
Addressing some flat spot when going WOT
This has everything to do with a motor refresh I did over the winter. The new engine doesn't like the old engine's carburetor settings. So right after, I dropped the main jets one step. But was still getting a too-rich condition only at WOT.
https://uniim1.shutterfly.com/ng/ser...nce/AFR101.jpg
https://uniim1.shutterfly.com/ng/ser...nce/AFR100.jpg
So yesterday I dropped the main jets another step, but left the SuperTrapp diffusers the way they were. I want to see the results first, before maybe adding the one diffuser I removed back.
That took care of the WOT/WFO flat spots, but was still able to occasionally get a 10 to show at WOT, so I might put the one SuperTrapp diffuser back. Noticeable pickup in midrange too by going with the leaner main jets. The lowest AFR witnessed was a 10.8:1 and it didn't feel like it prevented acceleration, even at higher altitudes. Only saw it for a split second, before the readings went more into the mid-11s. Mind you, this is on a RAM air bike, not one that relies only on atmospheric pressure.
AFR at Idle is still about the same as before, but under acceleration I'm mostly seeing ~12.5:1. At steady throttle from 1.5K - 3.2K it gets continuously leaner as we all would suspect, then steadily drops from 3.2K to 5K RPMs anywhere from high 14s into the lower 13s. Above that it doesn't change much unless I'm accelerating hard, then no matter what the RPMs are, I'm seeing 11s & 12s. Acceleration is quite good even when it shows 11s, surprisingly. At higher altitudes doing some 6th gear roll on/off/on does kind of throw out some crazy numbers. Some of that probably has to do with exhaust gas lag in getting to the O2 sensor to be measured.
In downhill riding scenarios at steady throttle it's common to see high 15s, low 16s. Off-throttle, low engine loading really doesn't mean anything other than that the engine isn't adding much fuel to basically spin the motor and to push what little drag there is being produced above 50 MPH. My bike seems to prefer anything from 11.0:1 - 14.7:1 on level ground, at speed.
Throttle response and acceleration throughout the RPM range feels really good and meaty now. I can certainly live with how she's performing:
https://media.tenor.com/images/d02ed...d0ed/tenor.gif
Glad I have this device. I would not have thought the mains to be the current issue without it, but they were exactly the issue.
Now to see how the bike performs at lower altitudes and what kind of MPG numbers the newer motor is truly capable of, without the handicap of jets that were about ~5% too rich for riding conditions.
Muzzy & stock muffler v. SuperTrapp, apples-to-apples.
After several rides to lower and higher altitudes, the best compromise (carbs are a compromise), are their current settings with the diffuser back in place. I need it in there for the higher summits and it doesn't make fueling so lean it's an issue at lower altitudes. If I need to ride at one or the other for extended periods, I can add or remove onel diffuser, but fueling is really good. I'm not at the maximum nor the minimum diffusers, so for me, there is a sweet spot.
But it gets better, because I purchased a second AEM UEGO gauge and wired up my other 2000 Ninja ZX-9R with a Muzzy pipe. With virtually the same jetting, the SuperTrapp bike is head and shoulders above the Muzzy bike in power and performance. I'm still looking to see if the Muzzy exhaust bike can do better at WOT operation with richer or leaner jetting than what's in it now. My sense is that one step leaner is the right way to go, but the UEGO readings off both bikes, say I should try to match the AFR numbers from the SuperTrapp as best as I can to the Muzzy. I know it can do better. I just got its mid-range a ton better, which is resulting in a parallel, but richer fuel graph from 1K - 8K RPM than the SuperTrapp bike's fueling. I definitely need to clean up the mains. At 3/4 - WOT, the Muzzy bike is definitely richer and too rich, making it obvious that 3/4 throttle works better for it than WFO throttle at the moment. But ironically when compared to the SuperTrapp's graph, it's leaner near redline and fluctuating more in the higher RPMs.
The Muzzy bike is a work in progress, so this isn't conclusive for me yet. I'd like to try out different main jets to maximize the WOT performance, per Factory Pro's recommendation, which is to set the mains first and work your way down. Then I can fine-tune the mid-range and clean up the pilot circuit with the help of the EUGO readings.
Comparing the two bikes:
Off the line, SuperTrapp wins. Mid-range, SuperTrapp wins. Top-end, SuperTrapp wins. Rapid throttle response, SuperTrapp wins. Fuel efficiency, SuperTrapp wins. Exhaust weight, Muzzy wins.
Haven't actually quarter miled my two bikes against one another, but I did run the SuperTrapp against another owner's 2000 ZX-9R. His is a lower mileage bike that I helped him rejet this Spring, running the stock exhaust, with a -1 countershaft sprocket for quicker acceleration. He confirmed the changes we made woke his bike up. Then we did about 10 first gear roll-on drag races through 3rd gear mostly him egging me on to show me how quick his bike was. The two bikes were evenly matched in 1st geary, but my SuperTrapp bike was basically walking away from his bike or holding it's own if his bike got the jump on mine. The longer the drag, the further my bike pulled his, even with his acceleration friendly gearing. While I was, I also wasn't surprised at how well my SuperTrapp bike did. This bike scares me enough to know it has a dangerous side that needs to be respected.
Back to the Muzzy bike though, I checked the compression too thinking that must be contributing to it's lack of oomph, but its valve clearances are within specs and compression numbers looked good. So racing the two bikes wouldn't be fair to the Muzzy bike at the moment. It's just not ready and would get its clock cleaned.
I'll know more in a week or two as I experiment more with the Muzzy's jetting. Since its exhaust flow is not adjustable like the SuperTrapp's, jetting is the only thing that I can use to adjust mixture readings. One way or the other, with the AEM UEGO gauge to help guide me, the Muzzy bike should improve to some level where I don't think I can improve it anymore. Then I can make a final determination on how it compares to the SuperTrapp bike. But I'm already eyeing my third 4" aluminum racing series muffler in place of the Muzzy CF muffler. I'm just not confident the Muzzy exhaust does as much for performance as the adjustable SuperTrapp. And performance is a motivator to make changes.
p.s. once the Muzzy bike is tuned ideally, I have my baby, my 2002 ZX-9R (SuperTrapp) that is ready to accept the UEGO gauge too. It's much closer in performance to my 2000 ZX-9R, but I'll be curious to see if it too can benefit some after I draw out it's RPM fuel mapping and compare it to the other SuperTrapp bike. Stay tuned. There's more to learn.
A follow-up to the July 11th post, the spirited ride with an Kawasaki H2
I half heartedly joke about how there almost appears to be this dependency where riders after a season or two riding along with the SuperTrapp ZX-9R sE1 or my 2002 sF1, also with a SuperTrapp muffler, shortly thereafter sell their bike for something better. Yeah, ha-ha, try as they will, try as they might, by the end of the ride the sE1 is leading them home. They're often tired, beat, and seemingly a little grumpy sometimes, scratching their heads about the ZX9 they cannot figure out. Or maybe that's simply down to them not feeling it on those days. Whatever, right?
In the past week, I had some work to do which afforded me the opportunity I'd wanted to take the sE1 out to build confidence again that the electrical woes are behind her. The work happened to be at my buddy's house, one who rides with me somewhat regularly, so I took the bike to and from (without incident).
I wrapped up my work and we took a break with his family (social distancing-like, with masks) watching motor racing replay highlights and I mentioned this bizarre thing that happened to me on the Internet that day. The site link took me to this infected Web site with a hook title about the 2021 H2. Blah, blah, blah... I finish my story and he says, you know your buddy with the H2 sold it, right? I reply no, but I was thinking he was pulling my chain, typical for him. All except for the fact that I've never explained to him my hypothesis from above. But he continued on matter-of-factish straight faced yawning. Yeah, he says, about two weeks ago. I spoke to him this week and he said he sold it. The H2 is gone.
No way, I reply, thinking here we go again! He sold it?!
I'm not exaggerating, that guy loved, talked up, and babied that H2! Every time we saw him, that bike was his pride and joy, focus of his world of attention. It's the only one in these parts, king of the hill. No question about it. Always clean, just a gorgeous mean looking beast of a bike. And for the brief mile or two he would ride with us, it was always on straight roads where he'd gun it or power wheelie at speed to show the obscene acceleration it had, before pealing off and doing his own thing while we headed towards the mountains.
He picked the bike up new in 2015, so he was the only owner. The guy who would show off the bike's untouchable power characteristics, even gave me a good reminder of it in case I'd forgotten when he rudely buzzed me that day months back. And now suddenly it's no longer the apple of his eye? That's one freaky coincidence!
I can't know what made him sell his supercharged H2, but it's not my intention to spoil other riders love of riding or attachment to their bikes. If anything, it’s just the opposite. I wish they could take as much enjoyment from riding as I do from the experiences I relish aboard my SuperTrapp ZX-9Rs.
Ethanol-Free E0 v E10 pump gas
Many, if not most, SuperTrapp owners might benefit from this little explanation of when to and when not to use Ethanol-free fuel (E0) or E10 ethanol enhanced pump gasoline. If you have carburetors and a SuperTrapp, this should interest you. Yeah, there is a difference that's more than what most of us are being told online.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cb3rtDa8fY0
Switched the gauge over to λ (Lambda). SuperTrapp diffusers unchanged
Looking forward to taking the bike out again soon to see what λ (Lambda) values she'll show. Not actually expecting any surprises, but confirmation.
According to the YT dyno tuners, I should be seeing a 0.75 - 0.77 λ for maximum power or 11.0 - 11.25:1 on the previous pump gasoline AFR scale. I'm thinking that's not going to be the case for this bike. It definitely appears to pull strongest at nothing less than 12.2:1 on E10 pump gas, and 12.6:1 when the tank was mostly ethanol-free.
AEM's table translates 12.2:1 AFR to ~0.84 λ. Today I was seeing 11s for lows at the higher elevations rolling 6th gear past slower traffic going uphill. But knowing what I was doing, I'd roll out a touch to get the AFR back up into the low 12s where power was better.
Steady cruise was bouncing around 13:3 - 13.5 on the highway @ 75 MPH. Still a little on the rich side due to the residual E0 mix. But I added 3g of E10 before returning home, so when I ride next, by the time I get rolling on the highway I'm hoping to see 0.92 - 094 λ at cruise or what would be 13.5 - 13.8:1 E10 AFR.
But the beauty of λ is that it doesn't anticipate whether I'm running E85, E10, or E0. To it the λ output will be the same due to the voltage coming from the O2 sensor. So if I want or need to stretch tank range to 100% maximum, I just have to hold 1.0 λ in 6th gear. And if I'm passing or accelerating, I'm hoping to confirm that 0.84 λ is the sweet spot.
My 900 got roasted by a 200 HP late model Aprilia RSV4 in the mountains.
We had ridden one of our staple mountain summits today, then headed into a small town for lunch. While there, motorcycles passed by here and there. Some stopped, then left. But this one guy showed up on an Aprilia RS-V4. Not sure what year, but it looked newish and had ABS, so probably like this 2020 model.
https://www.webbikeworld.com/wp-cont...rsv4-rr-03.jpg
We made pleasant chit-chat with him and invited him over to our table in the shade where we were lunching. He was headed towards the summit we had just ridden and we were headed home, but plans changed. He seemed like a really nice fellow. A little gray haired and by the looks of his tires, he had really wide chicken stripes. So why not give him a show and humble him. He was a former GSX-1000RR owner who loved the Aprilia after he bought it and sold the Zuk, because the Aprilia was all he really needed to get his thrills. 200 HP, fast as f*#@, faster than the Zuk, handles like a dream, ABS and TC. This is the bike to own, he said. Even took it to one trackday at Laguna Seca.
Nothing too impressive thus far, but nice conversation. Looking at the guy you’d assume he was your accountant, not a weekend sportbike warrior. He was in full leathers and did have a little damage to his pucks, but the tires!
I was on the sF1 today after an aborted departure on the sE1. There was a minor coolant leak, of all things. So I parked the E and mounted my other 9R. I wanted something with power and the Muzzy E1 wouldn't cut the mustard.
Timing had it that I was the first to get on the road, so I lead going back to the base of the summit, my buddy behind me, the Aprilia rider behind him and our third rider who loves joining our rides, but not in a spirited fashion, playing sweeper.
No surprises getting to the base. I waste no time taking off at a spirited pace, even up to extra legal speeds. I’m in my rhythm cooking along. That should do just nicely, I thought. It always has in the past. No way that guy is anywhere near me. True, but neither is my riding buddy. A few more corners and my riding buddy is up with me. No. Wait. That’s the other fellow. He’s passed my buddy and on my tail at my pace. Uh-oh. Thoughts change from sacking some innocent dude out for a ride, to we’ve been sandbagged.
This guy rides at race pace. I wave him through on an uphill straight and he literally takes off from me into triple digits. We’re on a short uphill straight that then jibs to the left and right up this canyon. So I give chase. I’m in 6th gear not doing triple digits so he’s still pulling on me, but after the corners he slows down a bit, like down to about 75 MPH so me and my buddy can catch up to him again before he reaches some tight stuff ahead. He’s playing cat-n-mouse with us.
Okay, so I’m willing to turn it up a notch too. Let's see how he does in round two. The tight stuff is up the mountain another couple miles. Let’s see what happens when he gets there. We get to the good stuff all stacked up nicely then he takes off again up to about 90 MPH heading into a 25 MPH corner. Holy crap! That’s not my pace, but I smoke it in too. He’s knee on the ground, smooth as silk through the right-left-right-left complex and I’m in 5th gear losing distance on him. Ahead, there’s a car that slows him briefly on a short straight. He blows past the car and dangles his right leg like Valentino Rossi into the corner before dropping the puck down. Seeing more riders coming up behind, the car pulls into a pull-out and lets us by. I don’t leg dangle into corners, so I just drop the puck, but his pace is too much! He’s gapping me already by about 60 yards. On up the mountain, with me and my buddy in hot pursuit we go until finally he gets stuck behind another vehicle into a slow blind corner. He’s able to make a break for it just as we come up upon the slower vehicle, but he has the jump on us. I go past and so does my KTM-1290 buddy.
We bunch up again immediately after. There’s a couple miles of sweepers that aren’t challenging, so we’re all cooling our heals behind the crazy but skilled old guy on the Aprilia. He's doing leg and arm stretches as we meander along, like that's just what he does in between.
I think, let’s see how he handles the downhill stuff on the other side. We get within about 1/4 mile of the good twisties going down and he again takes it up to about 90 MPH heading into a 35 MPH blind RH corner. He slows and I close in on him, but he accelerates away again to speeds I’m just not comfortable with going into blind downhill corners. It had just rained the night before and there was sand and gravel already observed in some of the corners. I'm not looking to go to the hospital today and my best isn't enough today. This could get ugly with the right wrong circumstances. I keep my pace and my buddy disappears behind me.
On down through left and right turns he’s again pulling away, stretching out his lead. By the time we’re midway down, he’s already pulled about 150 yards on me. Then he appears to slow a bit for whatever reason and I’m able to maintain the gap until the road opens up to straights again.
This time he slows way down and holds his speed. Thinking he wants me to take up lead, I maintain my pace on down the straighter sections of the mountain. He chooses to follow me to the bottom this time. It's just the two of us now. I could see there was a slower vehicle up ahead that would complicate the tight canyon corners near the bottom, but stopping would only provide for a gap at the cost of stopping in hot conditions (and I'm working out, sweating a fair amount), so I press on. I give it my best shot, but he’s right with me the whole way leading up to catching the slower vehicle. I have an opportunity to pass, so I take it, gapping him in the process, because he was left without room to come with me.
When we reach the bottom he turns his bike off and comes over to look over my bike, but doesn’t say anything before remounting his bike. We regroup and I compliment him on his extreme pace. I’ve ridden with a number of riders over at least the past decade and I’ve never seen anyone ride with such smooth surgical skill at this level. I jokingly tell my riding buddy, you follow him and I’ll follow you this time.
We set out in the other direction back over the mountain after everyone checks their fuel status. All good, we head up. Our Aprilia rider wheelies as he straightens out onto the roadway. This time though again, he’s not quite as aggressive, saying later he felt like his bike was sliding, so we’re able to hold onto his pace in the lower canyon stuff and on up the hill. An RV balks our pace just as we get midway up the mountain starting the tight steep stuff going up. He pulls around the RV as it moves over without wheeling this time and both of us are past too. My buddy wasn't fast in this section earlier and he wasn't fast now. He's holding me up a tad, letting the Aprilia rider gap us a little going up into a slower section. Then like a light switch, my buddy turns up the pace to the point that I’m having difficulty keeping up with his 1290.
We’re all flying up the mountain in order of fastest first and slowest, last, me. I’m at 9/10ths pace in 5th gear. When we get to the slower LH RH corners, I'm able to claw back on my riding buddy, but the Aprilia rider has once again gapped both of us easily by about 100 yards. I counted at one point and he was 7 seconds ahead of me. That’s a lot for such a short distance traveled. This guy isn't your run of the mill sportbike rider.
More of the same as we continued to the other side. Once at the junction he stopped for a brief chit-chat before we said our good-bye’s. We had to wait for our third rider to come along. He again gets off his bike and walks over to have a look at my bike, looking at the front, looking at the back. I suppose he's never seen this model Kawasaki before. He asks me, is that a 600??? No, I reply, it’s a ZX-9R, 900. I wasn’t prepared for his question or I would have thrown in, it’s the carburetted California emissions model from 2002, but hopefully we’ll meet up with this rider again in the future, now that we recognize him and his bike. Then we can fill in the gaps if needed.
https://uniim1.shutterfly.com/ng/ser...nhance/600.jpg
Again I compliment him on his smooth fast pace and he appeared humbled by my gushing praise. He said he rides this mountain 2 - 3 times a week, but today’s pace was probably the fastest he’s ever ridden it. His pace isn’t normally like this, he said. I’d hope not! Going off any of the corners on this mountain at the speeds he was doing could turn out badly.
We said our good-byes and off he went. Later, our threesome regrouped for some refreshments outside in some nice shade, the breeze cooling what our icy refreshments didn't. I told my KTM-1290 buddy he’s been sandbagging me. He replies, not really. I was riding faster than I cared to today. It wasn’t enjoyable for him, not how he prefers to ride. Our pace is typically spirited, more flowing and fun, but today it felt like we were racing, cards on the table.
If so, the Aprilia rider won going away. I could make excuses, but the SuperTrapp shod ZX-9R performed mightily today. It just wasn’t enough under my stewardship.
Tripped reserve at 210.7 miles on the way home from four gallons, dented by the unusual pace. One top off at the start of the day and nothing after for the sF1. Not so for my two riding companions. They had to refuel their KTMs twice more after their initial top off.
Guess what? The Muzzy has been replaced by my third Supertrapp!
https://www.zx-9r.net/images/smilies/vdance_smilie.gif Supertrapp motorcycle slip-on installation how-to. Replacing that awful Muzzy!
Preliminary AFRs indicate it's a whole new ballgame. In the 1 - 4K RPM range, everything is max rich now.
I have to complete the installation of the muffler, which entails having the brackets welded on. Then the muffler will be held firmly and I can begin power tuning on this third Supertrapp endowed sportbike as well.
And back to the original bike, the first one I installed a Supertrapp on
I had some peculiar issue with the operation and reliability of the bike. It was hard to diagnose. She even stranded me outside of town one night some months back. Fuel pump issue, again. Most said electrical, maybe 22 y.o. wiring starting to go bad and I was one of them. But I love riding this bike too much, I wasn't going to give up that easily. I couldn't understand what was killing my fuel pumps. The first OEM lasted 110,000 miles before it gave up. It was hit or miss on rides, but I couldn't go a couple ride seasons without one expiring and after putting in a new model, the bike still didn't feel happy. So, I rightly thought there was some other electrical gremlin nagging her.
Never underestimate the requirements specified by the engineers!! Turns out after the last one blew out, that I was able to refurbish the original Mitsubishi fuel pump with new OEM contact points. The bike was instantly transformed! It's been about 750 miles since then and nothing but gravy, the bike has never run better! Of course, it's the package deal; everything has a hand in it: Supertrapp, AEM UEGO, Keihin carburetors, Mitsubishi fuel pumps, TourmaX points, and the general overall operation of this now again ultra reliable Kawasaki motorcycle. I just needed that one key OEM component working, cutting off at the proper fuel pressure and drawing the correct current.
So what happened beyond just that? Her 150,000 mile milestone was within 229 miles and I wanted to eclipse that mark as a gesture to putting the nasty odd behavior she was experiencing in her rear view mirrors from 'made for' fuel pumps. So with little fanfare other than a camera, I set out to get in one last long ride before the weather changed permanently.
https://uniim1.shutterfly.com/render...&ts=1635558609
https://uniim1.shutterfly.com/render...&ts=1635558611
It was a lovely fun ride, despite some cold wet sections of road and having to navigate snow lined highway, but it was worth it. Just loved hearing that potent Supertrapp crackle and roar and taking in all in on my favorite bike of all time, my ZX-9R sE1.
https://uniim1.shutterfly.com/render...&ts=1635558603
But in my distracted state, I kind of blew it on fuel stops. I was way beyond the bikes r/t service range and I should have picked up fuel on my way back, but I kept fooling myself, without proof of what my final range would end up being, that I could probably divert to a gas station before town. No worries. Keep going!
Mileage piled up to the point where she had been tripping reserve like clockwork over these past two riding seasons. Only she didn't. So I checked the fuel tap position: ON. No worries. Continue on, she'll let you know. She did trip reserve a bit high on the last ride as well. It was probably a fluke though. Soon the odometer had clicked off ranges I'd only seen a couple other times before reserve was tripped. Okay, I thought, maybe the tap straw for the ON position just happened to pop loose. No worries, there are still gas stations in between, just a lot more expensive due to their remote locations. On we went until all previous personal records were now dispatched. She really had me worried, but then finally she tripped. I could smell cockpit fumes, which is her way of letting me know it'll soon be time to flip to reserve.
Needless to say, I didn't have to divert along the way for fuel, I bet on her backing up her range capability on what was in reserve. And she did, with flying colors. Topped her off to verify distance, then Google mapped the route to back up the odometer and fuel receipt.
Mind you, this wasn't a range run, it was a fairly typical ride, including passing slower vehicles in passing zones going up hill, some long idling stops, canyons and mountain twisties, all the usual stuff we typically do, at close to the pace I typically ride at. I say close to, because the road conditions at this time of year weren't conducive to full pace in some areas (snow, sand, moisture in shaded corners, etc).
So now, I need to run the UEGO numbers again, collect the new data stream. It'll be the standard by which my other two Supertrapp bikes will have to measure up to.
2 days of UEGO gauge recordings collected
Nothing too Earth shattering about the AFR numbers, from what I can tell. I've watched them repeatedly so it's ingrained in my memory. I think I was expecting something very different from the readings just based on seat-of-the-pants feel. No exciting headlines though. AFRs move predictably and consistently. For sure, the readings are not what I expected from the outset, nor from what I've seen dyno tuners use while tuning other bike engines.
If I had taken my bike to a dyno tuner at any point along my journey of bike ownership, I'm certain the results would not be anywhere near like the results via Supertrapp FAQ and then elevated by way of real-world UEGO readings.
The experience has taught me so much more than I imagined. Surprising as it might seem, to learn more, wasn't the original goal. It was to record what I thought was a perfect tune at the time, a tune unlike how she's now tuned. The UEGO told me things that only it could, that my 'perfect tune' of three years ago, could be better and that different fuels require different ideal jetting. Which meant that I couldn't leave well enough alone until I went down the path it lead me to discover for myself. RAM AIR motorcycles are difficult to tune via dyno, if not impossible. The dyno environment with an oxygen sensor probe stuck inside the tailpipe cannot reflect how the building air pressures effect AFRs. They can only tell the tuner how the bike performs from unrealistic negative airbox pressures. The O2 readings alone are so far off, that to use them to make jetting predictions, is a fools errand.
Don't read into this that my ZX-9R's current tune is a game changer for peak HP numbers. It's not. Sure, the bike is quite powerful, but ultimate top-end was never my goal. I feel the pinnacle of endurance street/canyon carving tune for my bike has been achieved and there's nothing more to learn from observing the oxygen readings coming off the bike's exhaust. I'd much rather just enjoy riding it on the street now.
https://uniim1.shutterfly.com/render...&ts=1621348322
And back to the original bike, the first one I installed a Supertrapp on
This one, the one I just put a Supertrapp aluminum racing series 2" ID x 13" L x 4" OD on.
https://uniim1.shutterfly.com/render...&ts=1639360198
Had quite the weekend with this bike's carburetors in below freezing outdoor temperatures in a garage with doors cracked to allow ventilation for gasoline fumes. This bike came to me as a third owner bike that looked wonderful on the outside but was basically a butchered mess on the inside. I doubt the second owner did any of that, he didn't seem like the mechanical DIY type. The original owner had dumped some money into it, from obvious inspection, that the bike was a trackbike with lights. One of the major issues I'd been having with it was the carburetors or perhaps exhaust flow. With all of those component settings and options exhausted, the last ditch item must have been the old exhaust muffler. Thus the Supertrapp, which I thought would be my last possible option in restoring the bike's power from idle to about 3/4 throttle. When that didn't do the trick, I knew it had to be an issue with how the carburetors were modified and I was right, finally!
Fortunately for me I had a spare set of decade old unused carburetors that fit my bike. I had purchased a rebuild kit from Parts Unlimited that was an OEM match, so I simply needed to drop in the stock parts from the modified carbs that were on the bike and use those settings as a starting point. In the process I finally saw what had been done to the working set that came with the bike. They'd been modified with a race kit from Factory Pro for the 49-state version of my bike, not my version, which is made for California. The CRB-K88-1.7-RK, 'race kit' wasn't a fit for the bike, even though there's a case study by a shop in Oregon on FP's Web site of doing exactly this modification to exactly this bike model using the 49-state race kit.
They start by saying Peak HP was 131.6 on the dynojet dynomometer and end up saying YEEE HAAA! What do you know.... 144.7 HP! 13.1 HP gained on top and significant gains throughout the RPM range above 5K RPM. I think this was what the original owner tried to emulate. He modified the carburetors exactly as that shop did, less the pilot jet increase. He replaced the stock exhaust with a full Muzzy exhaust, pulled out the main air jet and put in the RK air jet from FP, all basically the same as the shop did, but wow, did it fall short of expectations!!! The bike falls on its face off the line, like I said all the way up until about 3/4 throttle and 7,500 RPMs, when it finally comes alive. I bagged that set of carbs and returned them to the settings I found them at. I'd experimented with all of the possible combinations of components and while I'd see some hope in making one area better, another would go to crap. ENOUGH! As a race set of carburetors, they'd probably be okay. But I don't ride track, so it is of little use to me.
The other tidbits I'll add about the Factory Pro case study was that their 2000 ZX-9R was shop tuned in Hillsboro, OR, which has a base elevation of basically sea-level, 194' AMSL. The motorcycle's owner, Jim Gilbert of Ashland, Oregon, lived at a base elevation of 2,000' AMSL. It's a carbureted bike! You don't jet a carbureted bike rich for sea-level and send the owner up into the mountains with it! JHC! You have to detune it approximately one step for every 2,000' in elevation. Kawasaki recommends a reduction of 4% for 2,000' AMSL and 8% for 4,000.'
The shop tuner noted “customer complained about terrible "lean surge" at cruising and low speeds when he brought it in.” Which, as any ZX-9R owner who knows anything about their bike or has asked other owners online about it will tell you, is a simple combination $1.00 fix with a throttle body synchronization and pilot fuel screw reset. You add a 0.5 mm shim (washer) under the stock jet needle to effectively raise it, synchronized the carburetor throttle bodies, and set all of the pilot air screws to OEM turns out. PROBLEM SOLVED!
The stock settings on a 2000 ZX-9R are: Pilot Fuel Screw 1 5/8 turns out, #38 x 4 pilot jet, 4 mm +/- 2 mm float heights, N9BB jet needles on a standard 0.6 mm OEM wear washer, and a #160 out/#165 inside - Keihin main round jet stagger. The owner had already modified the main jet stagger however prior to dropping it off at the shop, putting in #165 out/#170 inside, an increase of 3% equally on all jet sizes.
The shop apparently missed that fact, one of many. They bumped his #165/#170 main stagger, calling it “stock,” with Factory Pro reverse staggered #178/#175 mains, a bump in fuel delivery of 8% on the outside cylinders and 3% on the inside over the previous jetting and 11% on the outside and 6% on the inside, over stock. They don't explain why they did it this way, but may have concluded incorrectly that Jim's ZX-9R was a 2002, which does use reverse stagger main jets, with staggered jet needles, as well. Factory Pro doesn’t mention reversing the stagger either as the way to install their RK race kit. But they didn’t point out the oddity either on their Web site. On top of all the other richer settings, the shop also bumped Jim's ZX-9R pilot jets 5% richer, from #38 to #40. Lastly, they installed an Akrapovic full exhaust system.
Neither the shop nor Factory Pro caught any of the problematic tuning errors: not the glaring elevation error, raising fuel delivery on a bike whose base elevation is 2,000' above where it is being tuned nor the compounding of larger than stock main jets nor the reverse stagger errors. But that's all beside the point. The shop showed a 10% gain in HP from their near sea-level elevation dyno. Which is either a false flubbing of some corrected dyno result numbers or a brilliant discovery. Jim was sent home with his tuned-for-sea-level carburetted sportbike with the oddest jetting configuration I've ever heard of, outside of some DIY horror stories. :confused: http://www.factorypro.com/prod_pages/prodk88.html
I would love to speak to Jim Gilbert to see if he loved the bike and still owns it. However, there is no record or follow-up to the story that I can find. Which is kind of odd in this day of Internet and social media chit-chat. Yeah the shop work was from 2000, but this is the pinnacle case study used as the benchmark of all benchmarks! Other than a final dyno run, we have nothing further to confirm the veracity of this monster tune that somehow turned compounded errors into massive results.
Moving back to my project though. I installed the used spare set with the same best-of settings as were on the FP set of carbs and the results were immediate. Better throttle response and power. Easier to get the bike off the line. Not perfect obviously. And this is where the UEGO comes into play again. There's no guesswork in what needs improving. I cannot diffuser my way out of this with my Supertrapp alone. The UEGO showed me where my initial jetting is deficient, so I know what I need to try next. I might even need to adjust in or out some of the Supertrapp diffusers too.
My Supertrapp was just roaring today on this bike!
Super satisfied at the moment. Started the day with some blockage in the spare set of once dirty carburetors I recently installed. One or two of the pilot circuits, maybe all of them, according to the UEGO, were clogged. Was getting 17s at idle this morning and the bike not running too well under 2K RPM.
After taking the bike out to visit with friends, I brought her back home for a cleaning of the pilot circuit. Ran the bike to almost a stall pulling into the garage. Wanted to drain the fuel out of the float bowls, since the carbs were coming off. 1-3 bowls were empty. #4 had fuel. Bingo! Could have been dirt in the pilot air jet at the mouth. Took several shots of carb cleaner before it was blasting out the pilot jet cavity like the others.
Slapped everything back together for a synchronization and idle speed test to verify the cleaning worked. The throttle bodies were enough of a mess that synchronizing them cured the rest of the idle weirdness. Overall jetting still is not perfect, but this isn't even the same bike anymore, way way way better and that slappy Muzzy exhaust note is GONE! My Supertrapp is just roaring! Sounds wonderful! A lot more power throughout. Easier to ride, absolutely no hint of stalling. Decent mid-range and this bike's got some grunt up top too, like I've never seen from it. She's pulling the front wheel off the ground by 8K RPM. And I can see by the UEGO she's not right yet while doing so, low 11s on the gauge, about 1.0 - 1.5 AFR too rich on the main jets.
There's lots of room for improvement, so... it was a good day! Not like before though with the Factory Pro jetting and Muzzy muffler, where the bike felt like it was a lost cause. Now I'm trying to determine if the improvements that remain might be restricted by the Muzzy 4-1 headers or if I perhaps mistook the cams for being stock when I looked last. But who cares, right? I'm just beside myself. Today felt like a giant leap forward. Kind of reminded me of some of the early days with my other Supertrapp ZX-9R, when I was questioning how long I'd keep it, because I didn't think I had the skills to make the bike better. Then after keeping at it, she just snapped out of it and became a dream to ride.
So it goes to show. Don't doubt the unknown. Keep driving forward. I was second guessing myself as I was digging into the bike today, due to all of the failed effort put in when it had the previous set of modified Factory Pro carburetors. This was the shot in my arm of confidence I needed. So telling myself to be thorough and accept putting in additional effort today when I could see the carburetors weren't right; like #4 paid off. 1 - 3 got a cleaning too, because I was already invested with the carbs off the bike anyway. Couldn't hurt to put in the extra 15 minutes to do all four, instead of the one that absolutely needed it.
Flying high tonight!
I'm closing in on a final setting for this bike, Supertrapp diffusers to come off
The primary goal has always been to get this bike to perform and secondarily make it more civilized than it is at the moment. I can report that I'm getting closer to one of the two goals, which means the second won't be far behind.
Right now, I have about 16 diffusers stacked on a 2" ID aluminum racing series. Unfortunately, Supertrapp doesn't mention this, but the small inlet series mufflers are also shorter than the bigger ones. At least, that's the way it is between the 2" and my other 2.5" ID mufflers. So, being that the muffler is smaller and has less internal volume, it's also significantly louder. But I accept that for the performance and observance of motorists on the road that I'm getting in return.
After the last major leap forward with the spare set of carburetors I owned, I adjusted once more to settings only slightly leaner. And with the help from my wide-band UEGO, I was shocked to see how sensitive the bike was. I was not prepared for what I was seeing. The bike was showing undesirable AFRs and letting me know that the main jets were still too big. So, I quickly returned back home and split the difference of the two changes I'd made, putting the washer shims back in under the jet needles, but leaving the pilot fuel screws at 1 3/8 turns. In this setup there is a lean flat spot around 2.5K RPMs and at WOT the mixtures are probably 4% too rich, but power and performance are closing in on my preferences.
At the moment, the bike feels like a 700 below 5 - 6K RPM. Not bad, but not like my other two Supertrapp ZX-9R Ninjas. Above 6K, the bike goes a little mental and feels more like a 900 or 925cc Ninja 9R. I rode it several times this weekend in a mix of street and highway conditions and I can definitely live with these settings. The bike is a little loud still, but when I have more time, I can address the main jet richness issue and revive shifting fuel around to the other carburetor circuits to really dial her in.
What confounds me though is how many people are so convinced that jet kits are better than just rejetting using factory replacement jet sizes. And in the case of the original owner and the case study of a Factory Pro "race kit," touting monstrous power gains throughout the RPM range, I am at a loss for what got lost in translation. I wasn't there to see how this bikes' projects were undertaken, obviously, but what a freaking disaster and waste of money and effort. There's really only a few possibilities to consider.
1) the bike may also have aftermarket cams? That could be true. But the cams appear to be stock, even though the engine does feel peaky.
2) whomever performed the race kit installation drilled or modified the original 50-state California EVAP carburetors incorrectly?
3) neither 1 or 2, the Factory Pro Race Kit, which is designed for the 49-state ZX-9R, does not work right with the 50-state model carburetors, as claimed in the case study?
4) none of the above, the race kit doesn't live up to its claims, which seems impossible given the number of people who have claimed otherwise.
I sure would have loved to take ownership of this bike where it did have monstrous power due to the race kit, just so I could have experienced what others are so brand loyal about with aftermarket jet kits. But on the flip side, any one of us could be deceitful or unable to recognize improvements from a step backwards. When you have a UEGO there is no compelling reason to do so, simply because whatever goal you're after, it'll guide you to it. You won't have to lie nor settle.
When it's time again, the next step will be to lower then main jet one or two steps, bump the JN into the 0.8 - 1.0 mm range and take off four to six Supertrapp diffusers.